"Fair and Balanced" does not mean having an opinion and getting a reaction, and possibly having an answer. There is the second opinion and possibly a third, that is just the start of getting somewhere which is a fourth perspective. That place is where we are going, and where we are coming from encompasses how to get there. These are the minimum vectors which are not just quadrants, for any geometry of meaning also entails a geometry of purpose, which again must be approached from at least these points. The purpose for some may be the action, for others simply the reaction.
The possible purpose at this point is that having a plan that is bad, but does not require forming another to stop it. It also points to the problem of the first plan, being simply an action or a reaction, but more honestly a pre-action that had it‘s own points that need checking. The charge that there is no plan to replace the bad plan, does not mean that the latter must move forward or will ever move us forward. That is the loop that simple action, reaction or even pre-action will not solve, without work on more points and plans and even the end point.
Just in case anyone wonders, a good starting point, has been the constitution. The three branches form an equilateral triangle, the point being the law. The press being the light needed to see their actions and all points between. Some would say, "the truth will set us free", others just "shut out the light". The purpose is freedom and the powers need balancing or the point will be what we get.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query geometry. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query geometry. Sort by date Show all posts
Tuesday, January 16, 2007
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Use of Labels
This is just a note that labels are not always useful.
[liberals, conservatives, progressives, neo-cons, communists, fascists]
However, LABELS as they are used below, may be helpful. The previous post includes the addition of the "label" ESCALATION but could be used for almost anything the administration does. At this time it places a focus on world powers and how they get along. The Geometry of Purpose? label refers basically to a structure of how to get things done. For example; focusing on one's own intentions from the grass roots up, not trickle down. Hence the Power Broker Mountain Project. This post is to explain some of the workings of this writer.
Trivium, for example represent the basic medieval course work at universities: grammar, logic and rhetoric. You can see where I am coming from and where we are going. Quadrivium is the upper division of the liberal arts composed of; arithmetic, geometry, astronomy and music.
Example of their use: Fuzzy Math and Fuzzy English = 1 heckuva result *
I will add to this post later, but another feature that I have just begun use of, is the search engine for the blog itself.(Just demonstrated click on heckuva) I will be inserting labels on previous posts, and clicking on them below will bring up that label's postings.
Bonus: LINK requires "Hard Work" of reading and more importantly filtering.
* in case more of a hint is needed, sometimes I am a hechuva speller as well.
[liberals, conservatives, progressives, neo-cons, communists, fascists]
However, LABELS as they are used below, may be helpful. The previous post includes the addition of the "label" ESCALATION but could be used for almost anything the administration does. At this time it places a focus on world powers and how they get along. The Geometry of Purpose? label refers basically to a structure of how to get things done. For example; focusing on one's own intentions from the grass roots up, not trickle down. Hence the Power Broker Mountain Project. This post is to explain some of the workings of this writer.
Trivium, for example represent the basic medieval course work at universities: grammar, logic and rhetoric. You can see where I am coming from and where we are going. Quadrivium is the upper division of the liberal arts composed of; arithmetic, geometry, astronomy and music.
Example of their use: Fuzzy Math and Fuzzy English = 1 heckuva result *
I will add to this post later, but another feature that I have just begun use of, is the search engine for the blog itself.(Just demonstrated click on heckuva) I will be inserting labels on previous posts, and clicking on them below will bring up that label's postings.
Bonus: LINK requires "Hard Work" of reading and more importantly filtering.
* in case more of a hint is needed, sometimes I am a hechuva speller as well.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Geometry of Purpose
Belated Congratulations for Fives Years
on Permanent Defense
Celebrating 5 years of facing the offensive likes of the Right,
and the offensive on the government and the middle class by
the likes of those like Tim Eyman.
Not that "3 strikes yer out" * does not work for baseball or should not be used to put repeat offenders in jail. It is too bad that at that rate Eyman is not at least out of the initiative business.
Geometry? Well there is the baseball diamond,
and then there is my paradigm I call The Power Broker Mountain Project [PBMP].
But I am thinking more of the parallel efforts which are being made not always in touch with each other, but headed in the same direction. My recent refocus on the local, means finetuning the approaches.
Two related efforts:
Not wanting to do justice to Culture Warrior Bill O'Reilly, I have coined, borrowed or claimed the position of Cultural Physicist, where everything matters. This effort led me to checking on an Internet parable (scroll down to The Tomato Company) and found the following Global Intelligence Briefing for CEOs found at The Braden Files by one Herb Meyer who by one American Thinker: "knocks the ball out of the park, explaining concisely and clearly the nature of the challenges facing Western Civilization."
And if I may connect more dots(and the ball park metaphor was not what I was going for) but I recall my poems on these parallels of sorts(the likes of who come to mind).
Right Face Left Faith
Great minds think alike
But being alike does not make right
Being right may make might
But more important is thinking
Right?
Being right is more likely
Why great minds will think alike
Thinking may not be so likely
In those that just think might
Right.
Faith is nowhere near alike
The truth that others think is might
Faith is might and more like maybe
Unless you only think it's right
Not maybe!
The physicist point?
Unified Poem
Everything
is but
a Wave
between
perspectives
in Time
and Space
Now to continue the path, and thanks again for the work of Andrew Villeneuve and Permanent Defense.
* just another initiative as segue
on Permanent Defense
Celebrating 5 years of facing the offensive likes of the Right,
and the offensive on the government and the middle class by
the likes of those like Tim Eyman.
Not that "3 strikes yer out" * does not work for baseball or should not be used to put repeat offenders in jail. It is too bad that at that rate Eyman is not at least out of the initiative business.
Geometry? Well there is the baseball diamond,
and then there is my paradigm I call The Power Broker Mountain Project [PBMP].
But I am thinking more of the parallel efforts which are being made not always in touch with each other, but headed in the same direction. My recent refocus on the local, means finetuning the approaches.
Two related efforts:
Not wanting to do justice to Culture Warrior Bill O'Reilly, I have coined, borrowed or claimed the position of Cultural Physicist, where everything matters. This effort led me to checking on an Internet parable (scroll down to The Tomato Company) and found the following Global Intelligence Briefing for CEOs found at The Braden Files by one Herb Meyer who by one American Thinker: "knocks the ball out of the park, explaining concisely and clearly the nature of the challenges facing Western Civilization."
And if I may connect more dots(and the ball park metaphor was not what I was going for) but I recall my poems on these parallels of sorts(the likes of who come to mind).
Right Face Left Faith
Great minds think alike
But being alike does not make right
Being right may make might
But more important is thinking
Right?
Being right is more likely
Why great minds will think alike
Thinking may not be so likely
In those that just think might
Right.
Faith is nowhere near alike
The truth that others think is might
Faith is might and more like maybe
Unless you only think it's right
Not maybe!
The physicist point?
Unified Poem
Everything
is but
a Wave
between
perspectives
in Time
and Space
Now to continue the path, and thanks again for the work of Andrew Villeneuve and Permanent Defense.
* just another initiative as segue
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government.
Cheney's place as "Angler" has now been disclosed in a four-part series in the Washington Post, where "understanding" is the key word.
[note that there is a lot of hard work here, by others *]
What does the Vice-President's claim that he is not part of the Executive Branch do to earlier claims of executive privilege? I think it would fall under Unitary theory that Cheney and Bush have whatever powers Cheney has decided for them and Bush understands only that, not that it puts Cheney in charge of the whole ball of wax.
A few earlier post of mine on the loop as long as we are into geometry.
The Truth Apparent: A Mobius Lap
Running with Rhetoric
Unreasonable Proof of/or Reality
Original Intent
Sorry for my own little four-part review(much shorter than the WaPo though, of which only three are out yet, and I've only read a few paragraphs), but as opposed to the "Angler" who approaches "the levers of power obliquely, skirting orderly lines of debate he once enforced as chief of staff to President Gerald R. Ford.", I must brink up my ealier tangents that have already visited the subjects but only touch a point on a curve.
From Randi's cite:*
House Democrats to cut funds for VP from Executive Branch. Raw Story
Senate challenge understanding as well. NY Times
Bush thinking (see above) "the law"
Press conference on "non issue" of oversight
On wire-taps by Judge
CIA of the going back to Nixon Era released.
Condemned or chosen to repeat.
GITMO A & B
HALLIBURTON A & B
Prosecutor Purge
Vote Caging: speaking of returns and locked up.
And off of AM1090 Seattle cite:
Democracy Now has Rocky Anderson as guest on the impeachment process.
Thanks to Randi Rhodes for the real "hard work", which I have not done yet by reading these, but getting them together is a start, and for you to continue the "hard work" as well. Of which, the first post indicates that Bush does not read much of what he signs from Cheney.
* This stems from a few days ago when this broke(the first link) and I was probably listening to Randi Rhodes and I thought, that if there is an EO (executive order)that Bush has signed and given their pattern of behavior, it does probably not apply to the President or whomever he choose not to appy it to, and probably didn't need to include a signing statement on his own EO as his privileges include that only he knows what he means. If that. And that is another imagined out or bunker of their mind. (I believe David Bender or Ring of Fire or a guest deserves note for the last reference.)
[note that there is a lot of hard work here, by others *]
What does the Vice-President's claim that he is not part of the Executive Branch do to earlier claims of executive privilege? I think it would fall under Unitary theory that Cheney and Bush have whatever powers Cheney has decided for them and Bush understands only that, not that it puts Cheney in charge of the whole ball of wax.
A few earlier post of mine on the loop as long as we are into geometry.
The Truth Apparent: A Mobius Lap
Running with Rhetoric
Unreasonable Proof of/or Reality
Original Intent
Sorry for my own little four-part review(much shorter than the WaPo though, of which only three are out yet, and I've only read a few paragraphs), but as opposed to the "Angler" who approaches "the levers of power obliquely, skirting orderly lines of debate he once enforced as chief of staff to President Gerald R. Ford.", I must brink up my ealier tangents that have already visited the subjects but only touch a point on a curve.
From Randi's cite:*
House Democrats to cut funds for VP from Executive Branch. Raw Story
Senate challenge understanding as well. NY Times
Bush thinking (see above) "the law"
Press conference on "non issue" of oversight
On wire-taps by Judge
CIA of the going back to Nixon Era released.
Condemned or chosen to repeat.
GITMO A & B
HALLIBURTON A & B
Prosecutor Purge
Vote Caging: speaking of returns and locked up.
And off of AM1090 Seattle cite:
Democracy Now has Rocky Anderson as guest on the impeachment process.
Thanks to Randi Rhodes for the real "hard work", which I have not done yet by reading these, but getting them together is a start, and for you to continue the "hard work" as well. Of which, the first post indicates that Bush does not read much of what he signs from Cheney.
* This stems from a few days ago when this broke(the first link) and I was probably listening to Randi Rhodes and I thought, that if there is an EO (executive order)that Bush has signed and given their pattern of behavior, it does probably not apply to the President or whomever he choose not to appy it to, and probably didn't need to include a signing statement on his own EO as his privileges include that only he knows what he means. If that. And that is another imagined out or bunker of their mind. (I believe David Bender or Ring of Fire or a guest deserves note for the last reference.)
Monday, May 02, 2016
Incomplete Geometry
In the process of investigating the genome piece there was a podcast of it which included a prior segment.
[Very Rough Thinking In Progress]
In a bit of preemptive* positing, I note the potential significance of 8 and 24 dimension.
Could it be that it is related to the fact that 2 cubed is eight and 8x3 is 24.
I say that without quibbling** over the definition of dimensions, but to say they are using it too purely mathematical.
But now that I have spelled it out, might it represent 3 dimensions in each of the 8 quadrants of standard x-y-z grid. Or am I just putting into words what it actually means in their math?
* having listened to the podcast but not done the math
** @ t we already have a different definition or do we? (x,y,z, & t)
then there are the dimentions[!] of Arthur Young, and by golly was that 8 or v/7?***
[!]= irony or (sic) that I found him with that spelling
Filing purposes:
Or round file of clean desktop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech_lattice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160421-the-evolutionary-argument-against-reality/
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160419-string-inflation-triangles/
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160330-sphere-packing-solved-in-higher-dimensions/
*** I was not aware of Young when I developed my own tetrahedron
(I credit a parsing of Einstein and a recreation of The Republic for my structure.)
BTW:
What is living?
5-4-16
May the Fourth be with you!
Quantum Bookmarks: 3:40, 5:16, 5:4, 6:50, ...
5-5-16 OW / VP (need more labels)
[Very Rough Thinking In Progress]
In a bit of preemptive* positing, I note the potential significance of 8 and 24 dimension.
Could it be that it is related to the fact that 2 cubed is eight and 8x3 is 24.
I say that without quibbling** over the definition of dimensions, but to say they are using it too purely mathematical.
But now that I have spelled it out, might it represent 3 dimensions in each of the 8 quadrants of standard x-y-z grid. Or am I just putting into words what it actually means in their math?
* having listened to the podcast but not done the math
** @ t we already have a different definition or do we? (x,y,z, & t)
then there are the dimentions[!] of Arthur Young, and by golly was that 8 or v/7?***
[!]= irony or (sic) that I found him with that spelling
Filing purposes:
Or round file of clean desktop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech_lattice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160421-the-evolutionary-argument-against-reality/
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160419-string-inflation-triangles/
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160330-sphere-packing-solved-in-higher-dimensions/
*** I was not aware of Young when I developed my own tetrahedron
(I credit a parsing of Einstein and a recreation of The Republic for my structure.)
BTW:
What is living?
May the Fourth be with you!
Quantum Bookmarks: 3:40, 5:16, 5:4, 6:50, ...
5-5-16 OW / VP (need more labels)
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
Truth Tellers
Thom Hartmann notes that the truth teller of the Democrats is Kucinich and for the Republicans it is Ron Paul, who notes the history of the Republican party as against wars. And thanks to a quick google, the first few paragraphs hits it out of the park **. "Way out", as it is put there. Or a slam dunk if you will.
That was still the situation when Clinton was president and even when the current Bush was campaigning against being nation builders and policeman to the world. Another point in this regard is that old Bush in a China Shop metaphor where:
when we broke it, we don't own it, but we might pay for it.
Final note: On Unity08 plans for a bipartisan ticket, I think it is crazy or at minimum won't work. Now, not that it won't succeed. But not necessarily for the country. It really is hard to take a negative attitude with something that seems so middle of the road, but then if we put the people in the middle of the road, they may just get run down. OK! So metaphors may not work, but the may make a point, and getting somewhere that has a point is the "hard work". There! Does that make any progress on the point. Well it may just be going round and round, but that may be another result, not that I am trying to get the geometry covered. But now that I have run that into the ground, I will take a tangent and note that there may be room for dialogue on the third party or third or fourth way. Dialogue and debate is happening within each party. If there are any outliers. Those hanging back; LaRouche (may get the point); Nader (I am not so sure); Bloomberg or Hagel; or not lastly Wesley Clark. But above we have noted, and I believe I recall now that my comparison (if not noted earlier) was between Ron Paul and LaRouche rather than Kucinich, that there are certain mavericks but at least they are participating now. I would harken back to my point about Red and Blue America and the threat to the green. It must be noted that "at the risk of being obvious" must have been too deep and the PI editors* changed my word "green" to "color" which put a completely different tint on my letter. My point is that Unity08 may be more about the green and may not get us out of seeing red.
*(In the last line of "the threat to the green" link, which may have been a threat to someone's green, if not not black and white enough to fit their grey matter.)
**11:35 AM amended [six paragraphs to be precise, I had not read much beyond "To many people, however..." and that is where we must remember the words of Rudy Guliani, on or shortly after September 11th, something like: Aren't you glad George Bush is president? Case closed. These guys cannot fight or debate without misconstruing the point or the enemy, period. Black and white enough?]
That was still the situation when Clinton was president and even when the current Bush was campaigning against being nation builders and policeman to the world. Another point in this regard is that old Bush in a China Shop metaphor where:
when we broke it, we don't own it, but we might pay for it.
Final note: On Unity08 plans for a bipartisan ticket, I think it is crazy or at minimum won't work. Now, not that it won't succeed. But not necessarily for the country. It really is hard to take a negative attitude with something that seems so middle of the road, but then if we put the people in the middle of the road, they may just get run down. OK! So metaphors may not work, but the may make a point, and getting somewhere that has a point is the "hard work". There! Does that make any progress on the point. Well it may just be going round and round, but that may be another result, not that I am trying to get the geometry covered. But now that I have run that into the ground, I will take a tangent and note that there may be room for dialogue on the third party or third or fourth way. Dialogue and debate is happening within each party. If there are any outliers. Those hanging back; LaRouche (may get the point); Nader (I am not so sure); Bloomberg or Hagel; or not lastly Wesley Clark. But above we have noted, and I believe I recall now that my comparison (if not noted earlier) was between Ron Paul and LaRouche rather than Kucinich, that there are certain mavericks but at least they are participating now. I would harken back to my point about Red and Blue America and the threat to the green. It must be noted that "at the risk of being obvious" must have been too deep and the PI editors* changed my word "green" to "color" which put a completely different tint on my letter. My point is that Unity08 may be more about the green and may not get us out of seeing red.
*(In the last line of "the threat to the green" link, which may have been a threat to someone's green, if not not black and white enough to fit their grey matter.)
**11:35 AM amended [six paragraphs to be precise, I had not read much beyond "To many people, however..." and that is where we must remember the words of Rudy Guliani, on or shortly after September 11th, something like: Aren't you glad George Bush is president? Case closed. These guys cannot fight or debate without misconstruing the point or the enemy, period. Black and white enough?]
Monday, August 17, 2015
Black Lives Matter
Hillary
Bernie
Trump
no trump ?*
file this **
*the Summer of Trump
** Amazon Culture
8-18-15: GPST
Donald Trump geometers like a third grader. (^)
Speaking of Self-tense. OW: Geo-Political Self Tents?
Sub-reference: Putting perspective in one's own frame.
Not to take my own tangent, but Hillary and Bernie are under pressure from many angles to craft their message so that it matters to the perspective of their critics. Nothing should take away from the words in this heading. Trump is another case of geometry at work***, formerly known as triangulation of the third way.
Back to what matters!? Do they feel the Bern? The operable "they" being the parties and campaigns, it is good exercise, or in some cases exorcise.
*** culture at work? (see: file this / bridging the law of intended consequences?) **
[Tea Party / Trump Party? 50 state scream? Why is there no Colbert of the Right?]
[As a not so side note: I cannot believe it has been a year since Ferguson. (~)
BTW: having been on somewhat of a successful sabbatical(correction: hi8us), there is a gap in my coverage as well as my social net.]
(^) not to be technical, but not sure of the grade
(BLM: budgets literally me~de~8!)
Bernie
Trump
no trump ?*
file this **
*the Summer of Trump
** Amazon Culture
8-18-15: GPST
Donald Trump geometers like a third grader. (^)
Speaking of Self-tense. OW: Geo-Political Self Tents?
Sub-reference: Putting perspective in one's own frame.
Not to take my own tangent, but Hillary and Bernie are under pressure from many angles to craft their message so that it matters to the perspective of their critics. Nothing should take away from the words in this heading. Trump is another case of geometry at work***, formerly known as triangulation of the third way.
Back to what matters!? Do they feel the Bern? The operable "they" being the parties and campaigns, it is good exercise, or in some cases exorcise.
*** culture at work? (see: file this / bridging the law of intended consequences?) **
[Tea Party / Trump Party? 50 state scream? Why is there no Colbert of the Right?]
[As a not so side note: I cannot believe it has been a year since Ferguson. (~)
BTW: having been on somewhat of a successful sabbatical(correction: hi8us), there is a gap in my coverage as well as my social net.]
(^) not to be technical, but not sure of the grade
(BLM: budgets literally me~de~8!)
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Ironoclast[!]
Irony + Iconoclast NOT [/?]
OK, mixed characterizations.
Bill Clinton, Mitt Romney and why 1992 matters for 2012 *
The big debt lie
Clinton Chimes in on Health Care.
Not to mention Ally Gory
But mostly this is about the previous Obtusity[?] and the embedded Obliquity, via triangulation and Geometry.
On the other hand: less tergiversating "Orderly!" i.e. "Bring 'em on!"
[Foot Loose]
* Romney may be a Clinton, but he is no Obama!
OK, mixed characterizations.
Bill Clinton, Mitt Romney and why 1992 matters for 2012 *
The big debt lie
Clinton Chimes in on Health Care.
Not to mention Ally Gory
But mostly this is about the previous Obtusity[?] and the embedded Obliquity, via triangulation and Geometry.
On the other hand: less tergiversating "Orderly!" i.e. "Bring 'em on!"
[Foot Loose]
* Romney may be a Clinton, but he is no Obama!
Thursday, July 05, 2012
Etch-A-Sketch 2.0
Or is that redundant?
Original intent* was Enough Smirking 2.0.
*or 3.0?[Or admiration for nuance]
[Anyway, choice of language was why I was reticent to continue the references to Smirking or Sketches. I mean when does the Etch-A-Sketch stop? I guess it is the nature of campaigns, like a Glenn Beck chalk talk.]
[Speaking of sourcing:
**Nature that [!]
[Hint: There is a Mitt of a geometricks re:sourcing.
Or Platonic Multiplicity. Yeah, that's the ticket!
Vu due the math.]
[Hint 2.0? The shortest distance between two points is a punchline. Ouch, not my point, but maybe Romney's straightline. It's geometry, politics and the table. Is Raw Money hiding behind Little Red Riding Hood? Or vaccinating attacks strategy?***]
QED ?
*** Foot N. O. T.?
[TBA: PAGES and De-Baits! i.e.(Note to self) Obama v. Romney recent speeches. JOBS/SCOTUS]
[It's not just me ? (7-6-12) Not Exactly ! The Para-Gone Seg way ? More later. ]
Original intent* was Enough Smirking 2.0.
*or 3.0?[Or admiration for nuance]
[Anyway, choice of language was why I was reticent to continue the references to Smirking or Sketches. I mean when does the Etch-A-Sketch stop? I guess it is the nature of campaigns, like a Glenn Beck chalk talk.]
[Speaking of sourcing:
“Unless things change and Obama can run on accomplishments, he will have to kill Romney,” said a prominent Democratic strategist aligned with the White House.Needless to say this is disgusting and should be disavowed by the campaign. However the full context just may be important, not that we have it ! Oar have we?]
**Nature that [!]
[Hint: There is a Mitt of a geometricks re:sourcing.
Or Platonic Multiplicity. Yeah, that's the ticket!
Vu due the math.]
[Hint 2.0? The shortest distance between two points is a punchline. Ouch, not my point, but maybe Romney's straightline. It's geometry, politics and the table. Is Raw Money hiding behind Little Red Riding Hood? Or vaccinating attacks strategy?***]
QED ?
*** Foot N. O. T.?
[TBA: PAGES and De-Baits! i.e.(Note to self) Obama v. Romney recent speeches. JOBS/SCOTUS]
[It's not just me ? (7-6-12) Not Exactly ! The Para-Gone Seg way ? More later. ]
Monday, September 23, 2013
Heuristic Concurrence and
Hermeneutics *or
* knot (5th D)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/concurrence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeneutics
Math is next to Godliness, geometry agnostic** to physics.[!]
** [!] i.e. to sort or transcend later
From the principles or tri angle(tan gent)lations or field works. The 4thD = a. Time b. Perpendicular c. E=mcHammer*** d. Tangent to eachGe. (4 mu lations)
*** two inserts 9-24 (@ later & Hammer) also Re: * Knot to go on, but more on 4 mu lations/=/"action of bringing or proposing"
plane fecundity.
* knot (5th D)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/concurrence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeneutics
Math is next to Godliness, geometry agnostic** to physics.[!]
** [!] i.e. to sort or transcend later
From the principles or tri angle(tan gent)lations or field works. The 4thD = a. Time b. Perpendicular c. E=mcHammer*** d. Tangent to eachGe. (4 mu lations)
*** two inserts 9-24 (@ later & Hammer) also Re: * Knot to go on, but more on 4 mu lations/=/"action of bringing or proposing"
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Ghost Busters
Every thing is PC. (Politically Conceptual)
Politics is the 4th* dimention(sic) of nature.(FP1)
* FB posting 2-25 / recreating here 2-26-14
F'n anachronism: i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
O W.
Politics is the 4th* dimention(sic) of nature.(FP1)
* FB posting 2-25 / recreating here 2-26-14
F'n anachronism: i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
O W.
[anachronistic construction of this post, the indicated youtube(*) was not fully viewed at insert]
Tan gents ? STOP! These inserts are like judging a blog by my model. I have only viewed one of them. Or in computer lingo GOTO line one. Here I will jump to a missing link, not to practice*** quantum effects***. Dimensions are not dimentions without a perspective. (Un-M-String from Slice of Pi^)**
** hit pause @ 0:13(4M theory?)
Monday, December 01, 2014
Thursday, March 19, 2015
Hegelian Rationality?
HR? Proposed Concept.
For the science religion dichotomy/dilemma. (1-2)
Rationality and irrationality at(3) the same table, and in the same chair. (shoes/feet/mouth/toss)*
VC: a Virtuous Clog? P5+1 example. Cotton pick'n GOP another.
State of Strauss and the Torah the antithesis?
Zion is asemantic!
Process proposal? Kant we... Waltz?
*pundittering additions
(#'d)inserts [ s~r , d/d ] :: (3) youtube IAM :: VC vital cognisance? :: State'n Hegel?
Original aphorism? (Wit'N Pythagorus)
Lables TBA : T'issue Tan'go? :: (to be Kantinued)
M-bed F'N:
Strauss : a. No Teddy , Para~graph Three! , Monday Morning Rally... , Bin(un)Jun'Go , Hegelian Rationality? , Neo-changian? , Relemma'n Leo , Esoteric Relemma[!]
RIG^ / SOG subj/obj geometry : RIG'N progress ~ N = poetics^ / Nietzsche? (tot~ology)
[ dit , IF, IW ] ~ lie`bearE? akin to NFR~'Y
Numbers R objective ideal and subjective reality? Cultural conditioning? 25~min.> systemic analysis/
meanfeltic[!] stastical rhetoric? Meta-Clastic?
For the science religion dichotomy/dilemma. (1-2)
Rationality and irrationality at(3) the same table, and in the same chair. (shoes/feet/mouth/toss)*
VC: a Virtuous Clog? P5+1 example. Cotton pick'n GOP another.
State of Strauss and the Torah the antithesis?
Zion is asemantic!
Process proposal? Kant we... Waltz?
*pundittering additions
(#'d)inserts [ s~r , d/d ] :: (3) youtube IAM :: VC vital cognisance? :: State'n Hegel?
Original aphorism? (Wit'N Pythagorus)
Lables TBA : T'issue Tan'go? :: (to be Kantinued)
M-bed F'N:
Strauss : a. No Teddy , Para~graph Three! , Monday Morning Rally... , Bin(un)Jun'Go , Hegelian Rationality? , Neo-changian? , Relemma'n Leo , Esoteric Relemma[!]
RIG^ / SOG subj/obj geometry : RIG'N progress ~ N = poetics^ / Nietzsche? (tot~ology)
[ dit , IF, IW ] ~ lie`bearE? akin to NFR~'Y
Numbers R objective ideal and subjective reality? Cultural conditioning? 25~min.> systemic analysis/
meanfeltic[!] stastical rhetoric? Meta-Clastic?
Friday, June 05, 2015
File of sorts.
Not exactly the proverbial round file, but I have resorted to NFRY's or QCON's where often the T'wain shall meet. Stop.
1. Not fully read yet.
2. Quick comment on news.
4. wane
3. tan gent
a. b. c. d. (...) thru ?
a2 Dark Matter, Anti-Matter (...) r2
a3 Mitt's BO*Son , d3 Bring It On!
The point being, that there is reading between the lines and there is lede or ship.
1.g Try Lemmings, j Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!, m ANN, h2 Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S.
2. Lemon Ship
Then there is (sc)[scroll/or/click] of share 'n angle or* lemon plank.
A, Breaking Trojan Goat* Leaks B.Fight On!, C, D Leaking Intelligence, E. Odyssey Dawn, F. Seconds, G. Roger That "V"
* of/or
Mean while ...
3. a. Future Bubble?, b. Skipping Geometry, c. Un-Hyper Links, d. Bricks and stones, e. Unspinning Charlotte!,
...Rubi'O's** Cube? Oops, I mean Walker's run.
** OW
[ThinkProgress, OurFuture.Com ]
1. Not fully read yet.
2. Quick comment on news.
4. wane
3. tan gent
a. b. c. d. (...) thru ?
a2 Dark Matter, Anti-Matter (...) r2
a3 Mitt's BO*Son , d3 Bring It On!
The point being, that there is reading between the lines and there is lede or ship.
1.g Try Lemmings, j Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!, m ANN, h2 Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S.
2. Lemon Ship
Then there is (sc)[scroll/or/click] of share 'n angle or* lemon plank.
A, Breaking Trojan Goat* Leaks B.Fight On!, C, D Leaking Intelligence, E. Odyssey Dawn, F. Seconds, G. Roger That "V"
* of/or
Mean while ...
3. a. Future Bubble?, b. Skipping Geometry, c. Un-Hyper Links, d. Bricks and stones, e. Unspinning Charlotte!,
...Rubi'O's** Cube? Oops, I mean Walker's run.
** OW
[ThinkProgress, OurFuture.Com ]
Monday, June 09, 2008
Parsed (& Partied) Political Process
Debate!
(the rest I needed)
OK, I have some catching up to do,
but will probably not.
(rocking the boat ain't bad,
but not Gilligan's Island)
OK, I was out of touch for the weekend.
As far as the vote and third parties,
I feel that more competition will help the debate.
As long as people realize where their vote will lead.
Triangulation may be the change we can believe in * ,
but not the leader. My hope is that indepedents from the left or the right, (say Nader and Barr) will be included in the debate, where triangulation is a form of navigation based on principles, but also where practicality hits the road. Give the poor track record of the media, and the bifurcation -(Red and Blue America)- of the internet(unfiltered), expanded participation may better focus the dialogue, but don't forget the green.
[Nader, Barr, and Green?]
[I leave you and Green to search and speak for your selves.]
[*: under Geometry of Purpose: related efforts, links no longer appear, but my point was by contrast to Bill O'Reilly, and definitely not to agree with the parable nor what is still found at American Thinker.]
(the rest I needed)
OK, I have some catching up to do,
but will probably not.
(rocking the boat ain't bad,
but not Gilligan's Island)
OK, I was out of touch for the weekend.
As far as the vote and third parties,
I feel that more competition will help the debate.
As long as people realize where their vote will lead.
Triangulation may be the change we can believe in * ,
but not the leader. My hope is that indepedents from the left or the right, (say Nader and Barr) will be included in the debate, where triangulation is a form of navigation based on principles, but also where practicality hits the road. Give the poor track record of the media, and the bifurcation -(Red and Blue America)- of the internet(unfiltered), expanded participation may better focus the dialogue, but don't forget the green.
[Nader, Barr, and Green?]
[I leave you and Green to search and speak for your selves.]
[*: under Geometry of Purpose: related efforts, links no longer appear, but my point was by contrast to Bill O'Reilly, and definitely not to agree with the parable nor what is still found at American Thinker.]
Sunday, March 01, 2015
F~N~8~ing
Tuesday, June 07, 2016
A pause-itive thought.
Infinity.
If there is an infinity of time going forward and back, why not the now.
Well, the space-time "continuum" deals with that.
Then, I have three blogs. They are not mine. They are just called mine on my Blogspot dashboard.
I don't actually follow them. They just happen to deal with material and what matters in a parallel way.
Example:
* actually at 3:21
If there is an infinity of time going forward and back, why not the now.
Well, the space-time "continuum" deals with that.
Then, I have three blogs. They are not mine. They are just called mine on my Blogspot dashboard.
I don't actually follow them. They just happen to deal with material and what matters in a parallel way.
Example:
The GOP’s Purity Problem
BTW: I am not conned by Darwin's God. I've only begun to think and thread lede or ships.
Models are the new frontier. Reading is not fundamental. Math is the bigger picture.
The Dems have a purity problem to, transparency is problematic and Darwin's God may be ironic.
6-10-16
Darned if this doesn't start out* with a wave equation, that is probably related to the geometry of a sphere.
Darned if this doesn't start out* with a wave equation, that is probably related to the geometry of a sphere.
* actually at 3:21
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
The Stick and the Carrot? POWER OF WILL?
Let Senator Spectre speak, and Senator Feingold carry the stick. The stick is the carrot that fills the will.
THANK YOU, RACHEL MADDOW
[ a tangent from her view of Spectre, as "speaking strongly and carrying a tiny stick" and the metaphor came to my usage today, on the whole gang, but here is what may be better filter in my search, not necessarily an endorsement , but a great idea: Even the counter intelligence can leak a point, meaning you cannot sue the president, but you can Impeach, subject dropped, but you can sue departments, and they are adding a crew there now.]
There is no one decider. There are three branches of government and the law is in the hands of the legislative with the power of the purse and war. The great decider may be above, but the great interpreter is not just the judiciary. Justice and the law must be above all, and we are all under it. To heck with the geometry, but is the will of the people, despite what will has been flip flopped. Not that any people are above the law, but must be part of the higher goal than just the process, or just below the process.
So speak softly and carry a big stick, but do not speak of the stick, but consider the carrot, if you talk preemption it is too late.
GWB: Global Warning Bull [do not misread: Warning, with an NNNNNNN!] * See Comment by me.
This portion is a tangent returned to from the arc above.
Congress investigates MisLeaders[Thank you, Waxman]
Here is the "be all and end all" from a Re:Cycler (aka: Deceivers Institute).
The point? Being. Not the end all or who peers over who.
THANK YOU, RACHEL MADDOW
[ a tangent from her view of Spectre, as "speaking strongly and carrying a tiny stick" and the metaphor came to my usage today, on the whole gang, but here is what may be better filter in my search, not necessarily an endorsement , but a great idea: Even the counter intelligence can leak a point, meaning you cannot sue the president, but you can Impeach, subject dropped, but you can sue departments, and they are adding a crew there now.]
There is no one decider. There are three branches of government and the law is in the hands of the legislative with the power of the purse and war. The great decider may be above, but the great interpreter is not just the judiciary. Justice and the law must be above all, and we are all under it. To heck with the geometry, but is the will of the people, despite what will has been flip flopped. Not that any people are above the law, but must be part of the higher goal than just the process, or just below the process.
So speak softly and carry a big stick, but do not speak of the stick, but consider the carrot, if you talk preemption it is too late.
GWB: Global Warning Bull [do not misread: Warning, with an NNNNNNN!] * See Comment by me.
This portion is a tangent returned to from the arc above.
Congress investigates MisLeaders[Thank you, Waxman]
Here is the "be all and end all" from a Re:Cycler (aka: Deceivers Institute).
The point? Being. Not the end all or who peers over who.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
The Tetrahedron Ramble*
What the heck** is the point? I revisit my Power Broker Mountain Project, or actually move on. What I call the prime disciplines as in fields of study, Physics, Psychology, and Philosophy form the base with Progress or their result as the point of their projection or application forming a reality or culture, as we know it, or think we know it, or feel we apply it, regardless.
The perspective that caused me to reconsider this model, or concept (as it also may be the perspective) is a proposition that Science, Religion, Politics, and Economics,(structures) have at least three things in common: Values, Ideology, and Power.(VIP) Now I don't want to be restricted to the math or geometry or insistence that there is meaning in them for some sake other than they are structures. But conceptually they are at the point of the tetrahedron and not the point of the tetrahedron any more than culture. Now to some this may have gotten nowhere, but we will get somewhere, with or without consideration of VIP and the Very Important Point of who and what we are or will become.
Is it no coincidence that there are three branches of the government, Legislative, Executive and Judiciary based on the constitution and the preamble, or that the first 10 amendments are called the Bill of Rights? Freedom and Justice are not forces to reckon*** with, but create.
*somewhat impromptu
** search fuzzy math and English; not to mention viscious cycle or golden rule
*** "bottom line"
The perspective that caused me to reconsider this model, or concept (as it also may be the perspective) is a proposition that Science, Religion, Politics, and Economics,(structures) have at least three things in common: Values, Ideology, and Power.(VIP) Now I don't want to be restricted to the math or geometry or insistence that there is meaning in them for some sake other than they are structures. But conceptually they are at the point of the tetrahedron and not the point of the tetrahedron any more than culture. Now to some this may have gotten nowhere, but we will get somewhere, with or without consideration of VIP and the Very Important Point of who and what we are or will become.
Is it no coincidence that there are three branches of the government, Legislative, Executive and Judiciary based on the constitution and the preamble, or that the first 10 amendments are called the Bill of Rights? Freedom and Justice are not forces to reckon*** with, but create.
*somewhat impromptu
** search fuzzy math and English; not to mention viscious cycle or golden rule
*** "bottom line"
Sunday, May 24, 2015
LeRoy's Lemma
Cube Root of Plato?**
1. Cube
2. Root [ow]
3. of ***
[ ! ] [!]
(~) p.27 $13 ii. *
* 5-26-15
(links inserted footnotes continued) NFRY
"This in fact is true of plane figures in geometry; but some spherical figures exhibit, notwithstanding a complete internal agreement, such a contrast in their external relation, that the one figure cannot possibly be put in the place of the other."
This segment is the tangent to the ying/yang/Jung of TOW.
** links inserted
*** associated/related words added.
Math pun of sorts: cube root of 27 is 3.
[ OW ] : Steven Clemons: On Olbermann [difficulties]
1. Cube
2. Root [ow]
3. of ***
[ ! ] [!]
(~) p.27 $13 ii. *
* 5-26-15
(links inserted footnotes continued) NFRY
"This in fact is true of plane figures in geometry; but some spherical figures exhibit, notwithstanding a complete internal agreement, such a contrast in their external relation, that the one figure cannot possibly be put in the place of the other."
This segment is the tangent to the ying/yang/Jung of TOW.
** links inserted
*** associated/related words added.
Math pun of sorts: cube root of 27 is 3.
[ OW ] : Steven Clemons: On Olbermann [difficulties]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)